A printed codex book is absolutely still my first and
best love, but I also enjoy ebooks and audiobooks so my Amazon.com purchases
are many and varied in terms of format.
I have an iPad and a Kindle Fire, but I do the vast
majority of my e-reading on a 3rd generation Kindle. And here is a fact that has surprised me – I
am in love with the near weightlessness of my old Kindle. Its base fits exactly into my left hand, with
thumb and pinky at the front sides, and their fellow fingers supporting the
back. My thumb rests naturally on the
page advance button, making page-turning practically effortless (and conveniently
freeing up that right hand to hold a frosty beverage!). By comparison, the Kindle Fire feels thick
and heavy to me. The iPad is just large
enough to sometimes pitch forward or backward in the middle of a sentence, before
a wobble of the wrist can bring it back into balance. These weight and size factors are not deal-breakers,
they just take some getting used to. And
the other devices have significant attractions of their own – color display,
touch screen, etc. But there is no
denying my preference for good old Kindle 3.
(Your mileage may vary; perhaps I just have a wimpy wrist.)
If something as minor as weight can sway my preference so
strongly, I think it’s important to remember that there are many factors related
to non-traditional formats that may influence a reader’s experience. And some of these aspects connect directly to
the appeal factors of the text itself.
In ebooks, pacing is affected by the fact that it is
sometimes difficult to determine your current progress in terms of pages. Am I closing in on the end of this
chapter? Of the book? I’m learning to glance down at the percent
bar at the bottom of the page, but that’s not as intuitive as the visual and
tangible cues I get when I’m at the beginning, middle, or end of a book. In her article, “E-books and Readers’
Advisory,” Katie Dunneback points out that even the amount of text visual on
the screen (dependent on screen size and customizable font-sizing) can limit a reader’s
perception of the content. “When you see
large blocks of texts on the page, this can indicate a description rich story,
possibly intended to be a leisurely read . . . Short paragraphs with lots of
dialogue can mean snappy or quick-witted characters” (Dunneback, p. 328). Losing those cues might affect a reader’s
interpretation of the story.
A reader’s perception of pacing can also be strongly affected
by the narration in audiobooks. Although
most of the audiobooks I’ve experienced have made terrific matches between
content and narrator, I have run across a few duds, in my opinion. The
All-True Travels and Adventures of Liddie Newton by Jane Smiley was read by
talented actress Mare Winningham. My
expectations were high but the book dragged so terribly for me that I gave up
at the halfway point, something I rarely do.
A friend who read it in book form loved every word of it! On the other hand, when another friend told
me that he was unimpressed by Leif Enger’s Peace
Like a River, I was agog. I had
expected a slam dunk victory when I made that suggestion. He told me that he read it in two sittings,
but just never really got engaged in the story.
Several years later the same friend raved about the glories of the book,
after listening to the Chad Lowe narration on audio during a car trip. I don’t think he even remembered that he’d
read it previously! The narrative pacing
of the audiobook had transformed the contents for him.
In addition to pacing, the tone of the narration can also
affect the tone of the printed words.
(OK, I worded that awkwardly, but you know what I mean.) Narrators make vocal choices that may or may
not match the author’s intent. This can
also be true of the tone individuals readers take when they internalize a
story, but the effect is significantly magnified by an external narrator.
In recent years I’ve developed a real taste for
audiobooks, and I already have a list of favorite narrators. The names Mark Bramhall, Kate Reading, Michael
Kramer, Cassandra Campbell, Simon Slater, and Karen White will attract me to a
book almost as surely as the author’s name.
It seems unlikely that narrators could ever attract readers to a book MORE
than the author himself/herself. Sacrilege! But then again . . . are we attracted to
movies by the screenwriter or by the actors?
Hmmmm.
References:
Dunneback, K. & Trott, B. (2011).
E-books and readers’ advisory. Reference and User Services Quarterly,
50(4), 325-329.
The library where I work is NOT compatible to an original Kindle - only Kindle Fire. Thus, patrons get very disappointed. It saddens me when we are not able to help patrons ... luckily the library 35 miles north of us is compatible to the Kindle so our patrons are able to reciprocal borrow = almost problem solved! I like your point about screenwriters & actors ... what drives me crazy is when they take the book & ruin the movie by not "following" the book! (or casting someone in a role who SO isn't "ROLEWORTHY!"
ReplyDeleteYour right on point with how e-books can impact pacing. It can be frustrating to not know how close you are to being finished. I mean, who really knows what 27% complete even means. That said, I feel that if the story is strong enough it's appeals will outweigh this inconvenience. If you are worried about how close you are to being done, maybe you should read something else. Unless of course, you are worried because you don't want it to end. Hmm...
ReplyDeleteI know what you mean about how the format can affect the pacing--I like looking at a print book to see how much of it I have left to read, which was a lot harder to do when I read on my Iphone.
ReplyDelete