
By Jo Baker
Knopf Doubleday Publishing
October, 2013
978-0385351232
What was
happening downstairs in the servants’ quarters while the Bennets, the Bingleys,
and the exasperatingly romantic Mr. D’Arcy were immersed in the events of Pride and Prejudice? Oh, it seemed like such a good idea for a
book.
Jo Baker
(The Undertow, 2012) paints a grim
and darkly-detailed portrait of the lives of household servants at Longbourn,
the family residence of the Bennets. Housemaid
Sarah suffers from chilblains while she toils at cleaning, laying fires, laundering,
and mending in a household of five daughters.
We see Lizzie, Jane, and the other Bennet sisters through Sarah’s eyes,
and the view is rather depressing. (“Perhaps that was why they spoke
instructions at her from behind an embroidery hoop or over the top of a book;
she had scrubbed away their sweat, their stains, their monthly blood; she knew
they weren’t as rarefied as angels, and so they just couldn’t look her in the
eye.”) When a new manservant, James, is
hired to assist the household, his controversial presence is a fascination to
the unworldly Sarah. James, however,
bears the scars of a wanderer’s life and too much of the second half of the
book is spent on the more gruesome details of his painful history. While the servants are only scantly aware of
Jane Austen’s plotline taking place upstairs, readers may be surprised at the
downstairs view of familiar characters such as Mr. Collins, Lydia Bennet, and
George Wickham. And Mrs. Hill, the
tough-minded cook, holds a jarring secret that connects the two worlds. The downcast tone of Baker’s narrative voice creates
a hopeless atmosphere which may be appropriate for the dismal lives of the servants
that people her pages. However, it is a discordant
shift from the wit and keenly-observed attitude of its source novel, and that dissonance
is hard to ignore. Readers unfamiliar
with Pride and Prejudice may be unaware
of the contrast, but will be weighed down by the uninviting grimness of life at
Longbourn.
Read-alikes,
sequels, and even zombie-themed tributes to Jane Austen have a good
track-record, so expect strong initial sales.
Additionally, fans of “Downton Abbey” may relish the idea of seeing the
Bennets from a below-stairs angle. Longbourn, however, is a better concept
than it is a novel.
[Disclaimer to my classmates: Although I'm an admirer of Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice is not on my list of favorite novels. So I'm not automatically primed to dislike any detour from the original novel. This just didn't work for me, so I thought I'd try my hand at a Kirkus-style slam. I am, however, in the minority here. Longbourn received rave reviews almost across the board. Somewhat ironically, the real Kirkus review calls the novel "irresistible."]
Looking at this cover I doubt I would pick it up assuming it is TOO much of a romantic tale. But, your description does make me wonder what it is like hearing from "Sarah." I actually have never read Pride & Prejudice (horrible I know being an English major) so maybe this wouldn't be a bad place to start "into the Jane Austen world."
ReplyDeleteInteresting! It was good to hear your perspective about this book. I would be shocked if this book wasn't well reviewed in real life considering the cultural love of Jane Austen and the popularity of Downton Abbey; however since I tend to disagree with overly enthusiastic reviews (either favorable or unfavorable) I think it was good to see the flip side! Thanks for sharing, and for giving us some background!
ReplyDeleteVery well done Marcia.
ReplyDelete